
|
|
Violation of the Home Repair and Remodeling Act, DuPage Bar Association Brief, April 2008By Michael T. Nigro As you plan for your home repair/improvement project, it is important to ask the right questions in order to protect your investment. The tips in this fact sheet should allow you to protect yourself and minimize the possibility that a misunderstanding may occur. Smith v Bogard In the recent case of Smith v Bogard i, the court found that violation of the Home Repair and Remodeling Act (Act) ii bars any recovery by a general contractor even for unjust enrichment and quantum meruit. The Bogards hired Smith to construct a room addition to their home. According to the Bogards, Smith estimated the cost at "$20,000 or less". Smith completed the construction and issued a bill for $25,515.85. The Bogards, who had previously paid $15,000, refused to pay the balance of $10,515.85 and Smith filed suit. Smith's amended complaint included counts for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit. The Bogards filed a motion to dismiss claiming Smith violated the Act by failing to provide them with the consumer-rights pamphlet and a written contract, as required by the Act. Smith argued, first, that the Act should not apply, as he was a subcontractor. Second, Smith argued that even if the Act voided his contract, it should not bar him from recovering on equitable theories. The trial court granted the motion to dismiss and the appellate court affirmed. The appellate court found that the record did not support Smith's contention that he was a subcontractor. The court noted that Smith provided a variety of general construction services, that the Bogards did not employ any other general contractor, and that they communicated directly with Smith regarding planning and construction. The court found that these factors indicated Smith was not a subcontractor. The appellate court went on to note that the Act was enacted for the protection of consumers against deceptive practices. Since Smith violated the Act, "...he is precluded from recovering any amounts he claims due for work performed." "Allowing a contractor when he breached certain provisions of the Act would run afoul of the legislature's intent of protecting consumers, would reward deceptive practices, and would be violative of public policy." Furthermore, the court held that since the contract was void, "the courts should not assist either party but will leave them where they have placed themselves". Finally, the court denied Smith equitable remedies on the basis that his violation of the Act created unclean hands. The ActThe Home Repair and Remodeling Act applies to all contractors contracting directly with an owner in the sum of $1,000.00 or more for the repair or remodel of existing residential units of six dwelling units or less. It applies to construction, installation, replacement or improvement of swimming pools, basements, chimneys, garages, fences, heating and cooling systems, windows and roofs, and the like. It does not apply to new constructioniii and it does not apply to a true subcontractoriv. In short, the Act applies to almost any contractor who contracts directly with the owner for home repair or remodeling services. The contractor must provide the consumer rights brochure "Home Repair: Know Your Consumer Rights." The contractor must obtain the homeowner's signature and date on a receipt of the brochurev. The contractor must also provide a written contract before work is commenced. The written contract must comply with the requirements of the Act. The contract must state the total cost, any charges for an estimate, the costs for parts and materials and the business name and street address of the contractorvi. Below is the required consumer rights brochure with an acknowledgement of receipt for the homeowners and contractor to sign. It must appear in at least 12 point type and in legible ink. As you plan for your home repair/improvement project, it is important to ask the right questions in order to protect your investment. The tips in this fact sheet should allow you to protect yourself and minimize the possibility that a misunderstanding may occur.
IF YOU THINK YOU HAVE BEEN DEFRAUDED OR YOU HAVE QUESTIONSIf you think you have been defrauded by a contractor or have any questions, please bring it to the attention of your State's Attorney or the Illinois Attorney General's Office. Attorney General Toll-Free Numbers
I, the homeowner, have received from the contractor a copy of the pamphlet entitled "Home Repair: Know Your Consumer Rights."
ABC Contractor, Inc. 999 Easy Lane, Always Compliant, IL. 60010 Telephone: __________
ConclusionAny contractor who directly contracts with an owner to do home repair work for $1,000 or more must comply with the Act. The Courts, no matter how much money is owed or how unjust the result may seem, will not aid those who violate the Act. Violation of the Act voids any contract and any claim to a mechanics lien. The existence of a contract is a prerequisite for a mechanics lienvii. Furthermore, a knowing violation of the Act is a violation of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Practices Actviii. This results in the contractor being liable to the owner for damages and attorneys fees and personal liability for those violating the Act. Prepared by:
i 2007 WL 4563999, Ill.App. 4 Dist. Dec. 2007. HOME | OUR FIRM | ATTORNEYS & PRACTICE AREAS | OUR STAFF OUR PROMISE | CONTACT US | LEGAL TOPICS | SITE MAP Nigro & Westfall, P.C. Copyright © 2001-2008 Nigro & Westfall, P.C. All rights reserved. |
||||||||||||||||